Investing

How tax loss harvesting turns market losses into tax wins The tax strategy can unlock similar benefits as tax-deferred accounts Tax loss harvesting, or TLH for short, is selling an asset at a loss (which can happen especially during market downturns) primarily to offset taxes owed on capital gains or income. It shifts some of the taxes you might owe now, in other words, into the future. But the key takeaway is this: TLH can take a portion of your taxable investing and effectively turn it into tax-deferred investing. And tax-deferred investing, as we’ll quickly demonstrate, can do wonders for wealth-building. Tax me now or tax me later Take a dollar you would’ve otherwise paid in taxes today. Now invest it wisely. Odds are, it’ll be worth a lot more in the long run, even taking away any taxes you eventually owe. Depending on how your tax situation shakes out over the years, tax-deferred investing can be like Uncle Sam giving you a nearly interest-free loan to invest. This is in large part why tax-deferred accounts like traditional 401(k)s and IRAs come with restrictions. They’re reserved for retirement, namely, and their contributions are capped. But tax loss harvesting opens an entirely new door for tax-deferred investing, along with a few other side benefits. For a few types of investors in particular, it offers tremendous upside. Who TLH benefits the most Let’s start with an important caveat: While TLH offers potential value for most investors, it can be a wash or actually increase your tax burden in certain cases. But for now, let’s focus on three types of investors who can reap some of the biggest rewards from the strategy: The high-income earner Once you’ve offset all of your realized capital gains taxes for a given year, any leftover harvested losses can be used to offset taxes on up to $3,000 of ordinary income. So in the case of high earners, this means trading a high income tax rate for a relatively low long-term capital gains tax rate. The end result is both deferring and discounting your taxes. The steady saver Not only are recurring deposits a great way to start a savings habit, they also produce more harvesting opportunities. That’s because the older an investment, the less likely it drops below its initial purchase price (aka “cost basis”) and can be harvested at a loss. A steady drip of deposits, monthly for example, creates fresh crops of investments for harvesting in the near future. The tax-smart philanthropist A common misconception of tax loss harvesting is that it helps you avoid paying taxes altogether. Believe it or not, however, two scenarios exist in which you actually can cancel out your tax obligation: The first is when you donate shares to charity. As we mentioned earlier, selling and replacing shares as part of a harvest increases their future tax bill. It does this by lowering the shares’ cost basis, or the initial purchase price used to calculate capital gains. If you donate and replace these shares down the road, however, you reset their cost basis to a new, higher level. This effectively wipes out their entire tax bill(!) that had accrued to that point. In the eyes of the IRS, it’s like those capital gains never happened, and it’s one big reason why wealthy investors have long paired TLH with the practice of donating shares. The second scenario is posthumously. At that point, you won’t get a tax break, of course. But any individuals who you leave shares to will, because immediately after your death, the cost basis of your investments similarly “steps up” to their current market value. Your harvest awaits Historically-speaking, tax loss harvesting has been too time-intensive and costly to execute for all but the wealthiest of investors. But technology like ours and the low-cost trading of ETFs have made it a tax strategy for the masses. Take the market volatility of 2025 as an example. In little more than two weeks (March 26-April 10), Betterment harvested nearly $60 million in tax losses for customers. If TLH is right for you, the sooner you open and start contributing to a taxable account, the sooner you can start giving a portion of your taxable investing an edge. If you already have a Betterment taxable account, here’s how to turn on tax loss harvesting.

How we make market downturns less scary And how it can benefit your investing’s bottom line. The recent round of tariffs and trade wars have roiled markets, offering the latest example of investing’s inherent volatility. The fact that market drops do happen, and happen with some regularity, means that managing them is not only possible but paramount. "It's not about whether you're right or wrong," the investor George Soros once quipped. "But how much money you make when you're right, and how much you lose when you're wrong." Mitigating losses, in other words, matters just as much as maximizing gains. And this is true for two important reasons: The bigger the loss, the more tempted you may be to sell assets and lock in those losses. The bigger the loss, the less fuel for growth you have when the market does rebound. Point A is psychological, while Point B is mathematical, so let’s take each one separately. In the process, we’ll explain how we build our portfolios to not only weather the storm, but soak up as many rays as possible when the sun shines again. Smoothing out your investing journey Imagine you’re given a choice of rides: one’s a hair-raising roller coaster, the other a bike ride through a series of rolling hills. Sure, thrill seekers may choose the first option, but we think most investors would prefer the latter, especially if the ride in question lasts for decades. So to smooth things out, we diversify. Owning a mix of asset types can help soften the blow on your portfolio when any one particular type underperforms. Our Core portfolio, for example, features a blend of asset types like U.S. stocks and global bonds. The chart below shows how those asset types have performed individually since 2018, compared with the blended approach of a 90% stocks, 10% bonds allocation of Core. As you can see, Core avoids the big losses that individual asset classes experience on the regular. That’s one reason why through all the ups and downs of the past 15 years, it’s delivered 9% composite annual time-weighted returns1, and that’s after fees are accounted for. 1As of 12/31/2024, and inception date 9/7/2011. Composite annual time-weighted returns: 12.7% over 1 year, 7.9% over 5 years, and 7.8% over 10 years. Composite performance calculated based on the dollar-weighted average of actual client time-weighted returns for the Core portfolio at 90/10 allocation, net of fees, includes dividend reinvestment, and excludes the impact of cash flows. Past performance not guaranteed, investing involves risk. Core’s exposure to global bonds and international stocks has also helped its cause, given their outperformance relative to U.S. stocks year-to-date amidst the current market volatility of 2025. A smoother ride can take your money farther Downside protection is all the more important when considering the “math of losses.” We’ll be the first to admit it’s hard math to follow, but it boils down to this: as a portfolio’s losses rack up, the gains required to break even grow exponentially. The chart below illustrates this with losses in blue, and the gains required to be made whole in orange. Notice how their relationship is anything but 1-to-1. This speaks to the previously-mentioned Point B: The bigger your losses, the less fuel for growth you have in the future. Investors call this “volatility drag,” and it’s why we carefully weigh the risk of an investment against its expected returns. By sizing them up together, expressed as the Sharpe ratio, we can help assess whether the reward of any particular asset justifies its risk. This matters because building long-term wealth is a marathon, not a race. It pays to pace yourself. And yet, there will still be bumps in the road Because no amount of downside protection will get rid of market volatility altogether. It’s okay to feel worried during drops. But hopefully, with more information on our portfolio construction and automated tools like tax loss harvesting, you can ride out the storm with a little more peace-of-mind. And if you’re looking for even more reassurance, consider upgrading to Betterment Premium and talking with our team of advisors.

How socially responsible investing connects your holdings to your heart Learn more about this increasingly-popular category of investing. Socially responsible investing (SRI), also known as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing, screens for companies that consider both their returns and their responsibility to the wider world. It’s a growing market for investors, with assets totaling $30 trillion as of 2022. We launched our first SRI portfolio back in 2017, and have since expanded to a lineup of three options: Broad Impact Social Impact Climate Impact All three are globally-diversified, low-cost, and built to help align your investing with your values. So let’s explore a few ways they do that, before tackling a common question about the SRI category in general: performance. How our Social Impact portfolio lifts up underserved groups Social Impact uses the Broad Impact portfolio’s foundation while adding a trio of funds focused on helping underserved groups get on equal footing. There’s $SHE and $JUST, which screen for U.S. companies demonstrating a commitment toward gender and social equality, respectively. Then there’s $VETZ, our latest addition to the portfolio. $VETZ is the first of its kind: a publicly-traded ETF that mainly invests in loans to active and retired U.S. service members, and the survivors of fallen veterans. These types of home and small-business loans have historically helped diversify portfolios, and they also help lower borrowing costs for veterans and their families. And unlike $SHE and $JUST, which are comprised of stocks, $VETZ is an all-bond fund. So even if you have a lower appetite for risk when investing, your SRI portfolio can maintain an exposure to socially responsible ETFs. How the $VOTE fund is shaking up shareholder activism Remember the “G” in ESG? It stands for governance, or how companies go about their business. Do they open up their books when necessary? Is their leadership diverse? Are they accountable to shareholders? On that last front, there’s the $VOTE ETF found in each one of our SRI portfolios. On the surface, it seems like a garden variety index fund tracking the S&P 500. Behind the scenes, however, it’s working to push companies toward positive environmental and social practices. It does this by way of “proxy” voting, or voting on behalf of the people who buy into the fund. Engine No. 1, the investment firm that manages $VOTE, puts these proxy votes to use during companies’ annual shareholder meetings, where individual shareholders, or the funds that represent them, vote on decisions like board members and corporate goals. In 2021, Engine No. 1 stunned the corporate world by persuading a majority of ExxonMobile shareholders to vote for three new board members in the name of lowering the company’s carbon footprint. And it did all this in spite of holding just .02% of the company’s shares itself. Not a bad return on investment, huh? Does SRI sacrifice gains in the name of good? We now stand eye-to-eye with the elephant in the room: performance. Worrying about returns is common regardless of your portfolio, so it’s only natural to question how socially responsible investing in general stacks up against the alternatives. Well, the evidence points to SRI comparing quite well. According to a survey of 1,141 peer-reviewed papers and other similar meta-reviews: The performance of SRI funds has “on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing.” And while the researchers note that it’s “likely that these propositions will evolve,” they also found evidence that SRI funds may offer “downside” protection in times of social or economic crisis such as pandemics. Your socially responsible investing, in other words, is anything but a charity case. Simplifying the socially responsible space Not long ago, SRI was barely a blip on the radar of everyday investors. If you were hip to it, you likely had just two options: DIY the research and purchase of individual SRI stocks Pay a premium to buy into one of the few funds out there at the time Those days are thankfully in the past, because our portfolios make it easy to express your values through your investing. And our team of investing experts regularly seeks out new funds like $VETZ and updated SRI standards that strive to deliver more impact while helping you reach your goals. Check out our full methodology if you’re hungry for more details. And if you’re ready to invest for a better world, we’ve got you covered.

Our Socially Responsible Investing portfolios methodology Learn how we construct our Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) portfolios. Table of Contents Introduction How do we define SRI? The Challenges of SRI Portfolio Construction How is Betterment’s Broad Impact portfolio constructed? How is Betterment’s Climate Impact portfolio constructed? How is Betterment’s Social Impact portfolio constructed? Conclusion Introduction Betterment launched its first Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) portfolio in 2017, and has widened the investment options under that umbrella since then. Within Betterment’s SRI options, we currently offer a Broad Impact portfolio and two additional, more focused SRI portfolio options: a Social Impact SRI portfolio (focused on social empowerment) and a Climate Impact SRI portfolio (focused on climate-conscious investments). These portfolios represent a diversified, relatively low-cost solution constructed using exchange traded funds (ETFs), which will be continually improved upon as costs decline, more data emerges, and as a result, the availability of SRI funds broadens. How do we define SRI? Our approach to SRI has three fundamental dimensions that shape our portfolio construction mandates: Reducing exposure to investments involved in unsustainable activities and environmental, social, or governmental controversies. Increasing exposure to investments that work to address solutions for core environmental and social challenges in measurable ways. Allocating to investments that use shareholder engagement tools, such as shareholder proposals and proxy voting, to incentivize socially responsible corporate behavior. SRI is the traditional name for the broad concept of values-driven investing (many experts now favor “sustainable investing” as the name for the entire category). Our SRI approach uses SRI mandates based on a set of industry criteria known as “ESG,” which stands for Environmental, Social and Governance. ESG refers specifically to the quantifiable dimensions of a company’s standing along each of its three components. Betterment’s approach expands upon the ESG-investing framework with exposure to investments that use complementary shareholder engagement tools. Betterment does not directly select companies to include in, or exclude from, the SRI portfolios. Rather, Betterment identifies ETFs that have been classified as ESG or similar by third-parties and considers internally developed “SRI mandates” alongside other qualitative and quantitative factors to select ETFs to include in its SRI portfolios. Using SRI Mandates One aspect of improving a portfolio’s ESG exposure is reducing exposure to companies that engage in certain activities that may be considered undesirable because they do not align with specific values. These activities may include selling tobacco, military weapons, civilian firearms, as well as involvement in recent and ongoing ESG controversies. However, SRI is about more than just adjusting your portfolio to minimize companies with a poor social impact. For each Betterment SRI portfolio, the portfolio construction process considers one or more internally developed “SRI mandates.” Betterment’s SRI mandates are sustainable investing objectives that we include in our portfolios’ exposures. SRI Mandate Description Betterment SRI Portfolio Mapping ESG Mandate ETFs tracking indices which are constructed with reference to some form of ESG optimization, which promotes exposure to Environmental, Social, and Governance pillars. Broad, Climate, Social Impact Portfolios Fossil Fuel Divestment Mandate ETFs tracking indices which are constructed with the aim of excluding stocks in companies with major fossil fuels holdings (divestment). Climate Impact Portfolio Carbon Footprint Mandate ETFs tracking indices which are constructed with the aim of minimizing exposure to carbon emissions across the entire economy (rather than focus on screening out exposure to stocks primarily in the energy sector). Climate Impact Portfolio Green Financing Mandates ETFs tracking indices focused on financing environmentally beneficial activities directly. Climate Impact Portfolio Gender Equity Mandate ETFs tracking indices which are constructed with the aim of representing the performance of companies that seek to advance gender equality. Social Impact Portfolio Social Equity Mandate ETFs managed with the aim of obtaining exposures in investments that seek to advance vulnerable, disadvantaged, or underserved social groups. The Gender Equity Mandate also contributes to fulfilling this broader mandate. Social Impact Portfolio Shareholder Engagement Mandate In addition to the mandates listed above, Betterment’s SRI portfolios are constructed using a shareholder engagement mandate. One of the most direct ways a shareholder can influence a company’s decision making is through shareholder proposals and proxy voting. Publicly traded companies have annual meetings where they report on the business’s activities to shareholders. As a part of these meetings, shareholders can vote on a number of topics such as share ownership, the composition of the board of directors, and executive level compensation. Shareholders receive information on the topics to be voted on prior to the meeting in the form of a proxy statement, and can vote on these topics through a proxy card. A shareholder can also make an explicit recommendation for the company to take a specific course of action through a shareholder proposal. ETF shareholders themselves do not vote in the proxy voting process of underlying companies, but rather the ETF fund issuer participates in the proxy voting process on behalf of their shareholders. As investors signal increasing interest in ESG engagement, more ETF fund issuers have emerged that play a more active role engaging with underlying companies through proxy voting to advocate for more socially responsible corporate practices. These issuers use engagement-based strategies, such as shareholder proposals and director nominees, to engage with companies to bring about ESG change and allow investors in the ETF to express a socially responsible preference. For this reason, Betterment includes a Shareholder Engagement Mandate in its SRI portfolios. Mandate Description Betterment SRI Portfolio Mapping Shareholder Engagement Mandate ETFs which aim to fulfill one or more of the above mandates, not via allocation decisions, but rather through the shareholder engagement process, such as proxy voting. Broad, Climate, Social Impact Portfolios The Challenges of SRI Portfolio Construction For Betterment, three limitations have a large influence on our overall approach to building an SRI portfolio: 1. Many existing SRI offerings in the market have serious shortcomings. Many SRI offerings today sacrifice sufficient diversification appropriate for investors who seek market returns, and/or do not provide investors an avenue to use collective action to bring about ESG change. Betterment’s SRI portfolios do not sacrifice global diversification. Consistent with our core principle of global diversification and to ensure both domestic and international bond exposure, we’re still allocating to some funds without an ESG mandate, until satisfactory solutions are available within those asset classes. Additionally, all three of Betterment’s SRI portfolios include a partial allocation to an engagement-based socially responsible ETF using shareholder advocacy as a means to bring about ESG-change in corporate behavior. Engagement-based socially responsible ETFs have expressive value in that they allow investors to signal their interest in ESG issues to companies and the market more broadly, even if particular shareholder campaigns are unsuccessful. 2. Integrating values into an ETF portfolio may not always meet every investor’s expectations. For investors who prioritize an absolute exclusion of specific types of companies above all else, certain approaches to ESG will inevitably fall short of expectations. For example, many of the largest ESG funds focused on US Large Cap stocks include some energy companies that engage in oil and natural gas exploration, like Hess. While Hess might not meet the criteria of the “E” pillar of ESG, it could still meet the criteria in terms of the “S” and the “G.” Understanding that investors may prefer to focus specifically on a certain pillar of ESG, Betterment has made three SRI portfolios available. The Broad Impact portfolio seeks to balance each of the three dimensions of ESG without diluting different dimensions of social responsibility. With our Social Impact portfolio, we sharpen the focus on social equity with partial allocations to gender diversity and veteran impact focused funds. With our Climate Impact portfolio, we sharpen the focus on controlling carbon emissions and fostering green solutions. 3. Most available SRI-oriented ETFs present liquidity limitations. While SRI-oriented ETFs have relatively low expense ratios compared to SRI mutual funds, our analysis revealed insufficient liquidity in many ETFs currently on the market. Without sufficient liquidity, every execution becomes more expensive, creating a drag on returns. Median daily dollar volume is one way of estimating liquidity. Higher volume on a given asset means that you can quickly buy (or sell) more of that asset in the market without driving the price up (or down). The degree to which you can drive the price up or down with your buying or selling must be treated as a cost that can drag down on your returns. To that end, Betterment reassesses the funds available for inclusion in these portfolios regularly. In balancing cost and value for the portfolios, the options are limited to funds of certain asset classes such as US stocks, Developed Market stocks, Emerging Market stocks, US Investment Grade Corporate Bonds, US High Quality bonds, and US Mortgage-Backed Securities. How is Betterment’s Broad Impact portfolio constructed? Betterment’s Broad Impact portfolio invests assets in socially responsible ETFs to obtain exposure to both the ESG and Shareholder Engagement mandates, as highlighted in the table above. It focuses on ETFs that consider all three ESG pillars, and includes an allocation to an engagement-based SRI ETF. Broad ESG investing solutions are currently the most liquid, highlighting their popularity amongst investors. In order to maintain geographic and asset class diversification and to meet our requirements for lower cost and higher liquidity in all SRI portfolios, we continue to allocate to some funds that do not reflect SRI mandates, particularly in bond asset classes. How is Betterment’s Climate Impact portfolio constructed? Betterment offers a Climate Impact portfolio for investors that want to invest in an SRI strategy more focused on the environmental pillar of “ESG” rather than focusing on all ESG dimensions equally. Betterment’s Climate Impact portfolio invests assets in socially responsible ETFs and is constructed using the following mandates that seek to achieve divestment and engagement: ESG, carbon footprint reduction, fossil fuel divestment, shareholder engagement, and green financing. The Climate Impact portfolio was designed to give investors exposure to climate-conscious investments, without sacrificing proper diversification and balanced cost. Fund selection for this portfolio follows the same guidelines established for the Broad Impact portfolio, as we seek to incorporate broad based climate-focused ETFs with sufficient liquidity relative to their size in the portfolio. How can the Climate Impact portfolio help to positively affect climate change? The Climate Impact portfolio is allocated to iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN), an ETF which seeks to track the global stock market, but with a bias towards companies with a lower carbon footprint. By investing in CRBN, investors are actively supporting companies with a lower carbon footprint, because CRBN overweights these stocks relative to their high-carbon emitting peers. One way we can measure the carbon impact a fund has is by looking at its weighted average carbon intensity, which measures the weighted average of tons of CO2 emissions per million dollars in sales, based on the fund's underlying holdings. Based on weighted average carbon intensity data from MSCI, Betterment’s 100% stock Climate Impact portfolio has carbon emissions per unit sales that are more than 47% lower than Betterment’s 100% stock Core portfolio as of March 12, 2025. Additionally, a portion of the Climate Impact portfolio is allocated to fossil fuel reserve funds. Rather than ranking and weighting funds based on a certain climate metric like CRBN, fossil fuel reserve free funds instead exclude companies that own fossil fuel reserves, defined as crude oil, natural gas, and thermal coal. By investing in fossil fuel reserve free funds, investors are actively divesting from companies with some of the most negative impact on climate change, including oil producers, refineries, and coal miners such as Chevron, ExxonMobile, BP, and Peabody Energy. Another way that the Climate Impact portfolio promotes a positive environmental impact is by investing in bonds that fund green projects. The Climate Impact portfolio invests in iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN), which tracks the global market of investment-grade bonds linked to environmentally beneficial projects, as determined by MSCI. These bonds are called “green bonds.” The green bonds held by BGRN fund projects in a number of environmental categories defined by MSCI including alternative energy, energy efficiency, pollution prevention and control, sustainable water, green building, and climate adaptation. How is Betterment’s Social Impact portfolio constructed? Betterment offers a Social Impact portfolio for investors that want to invest in a strategy more focused on the social pillar of ESG investing (the S in ESG). Betterment’s Social Impact portfolio invests assets in socially responsible ETFs and is constructed using the following mandates: ESG, gender equity, social equity, and shareholder engagement. The Social Impact portfolio was designed to give investors exposure to investments which promote social empowerment without sacrificing proper diversification and balanced cost. Fund selection for this portfolio follows the same guidelines established for the Broad Impact portfolio discussed above, as we seek to incorporate broad based ETFs that focus on social empowerment with sufficient liquidity relative to their size in the portfolio. How does the Social Impact portfolio help promote social empowerment? The Social Impact portfolio shares many of the same holdings as Betterment’s Broad Impact portfolio. The Social Impact portfolio additionally looks to further promote the “social” pillar of ESG investing by allocating to the following ETFs: SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) Academy Veteran Impact ETF(VETZ) Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) SHE is a US Stock ETF that allows investors to invest in more female-led companies compared to the broader market. In order to achieve this objective, companies are ranked within each sector according to their ratio of women in senior leadership positions. Only companies that rank highly within each sector are eligible for inclusion in the fund. By investing in SHE, investors are allocating more of their money to companies that have demonstrated greater gender diversity within senior leadership than other firms in their sector. VETZ, the Academy Veteran Impact ETF, is a US Bond ETF and is the first publicly traded ETF to primarily invest in loans to U.S. service members, military veterans, their survivors, and veteran-owned businesses. A majority of the underlying assets consist of loans to veterans or their families. The fund primarily invests in Mortgage-Backed Securities that are guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises, such as Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. The fund also invests in pools of small business loans backed by the Small Business Administration (SBA). JUST, Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, invests in U.S. companies promoting positive change on key social issues, such as worker wellbeing, customer privacy, environmental impact, and community strength, based on the values of the American public as identified by JUST Capital’s polling. Investment in socially responsible ETFs varies by portfolio allocation; not all allocations include the specific ETFs listed above. For more information about these social impact ETFs, including any associated risks, please see our disclosures. Should we expect any difference in an SRI portfolio’s performance? One might expect that a socially responsible portfolio could lead to lower returns in the long term compared to another, similar portfolio. The notion behind this reasoning is that somehow there is a premium to be paid for investing based on your social ideals and values. A white paper written in partnership between Rockefeller Asset Management and NYU Stern Center for Sustainable Business studied 1,000+ research papers published from 2015 to 2020 analyzing the relationship between ESG investing and performance. The primary takeaway from this research was that they found “positive correlations between ESG performance and operational efficiencies, stock performance, and lower cost of capital.” When ESG factors were considered in the study, there seemed to be improved performance potential over longer time periods and potential to also provide downside protection during periods of crisis. It’s important to note that performance in the SRI portfolios can be impacted by several variables, and is not guaranteed to align with the results of this study. Dividend Yields Could Be Lower Using the SRI Broad Impact portfolio for reference, dividend yields over a one-year period ending March 31, 2025 indicate that SRI income returns at certain risk levels have been lower than those of the Core portfolio. Oil and gas companies like BP, Chevron, and Exxon, for example, currently have relatively high dividend yields, and excluding them from a given portfolio can cause its income return to be lower. Of course, future dividend yields are uncertain variables and past data may not provide accurate forecasts. Nevertheless, lower dividend yields can be a factor in driving total returns for SRI portfolios to be lower than those of Core portfolios. Comparison of Dividend Yields Source: Bloomberg, Calculations by Betterment for one year period ending March 31, 2025. Dividend yields for each portfolio are calculated using the dividend yields of the primary ETFs used for taxable allocations of Betterment’s portfolios as of March 2025. Conclusion Despite the various limitations that all SRI implementations face today, Betterment will continue to support its customers in further aligning their values to their investments. Betterment may add additional socially responsible funds to the SRI portfolios and replace other ETFs as the investing landscape continues to evolve.

Four ways we help trim your tax bill And why these "invisible" wins matter more than you may think. When you choose an advisor to help guide your investing, you may focus only on what you can see. Things like their investment options, and the expected returns of those investments. Less obvious—but no less important—to your money’s future growth, however, is tax optimization. It sounds boring, but believe us, taxes can steadily eat away at your returns over the years. And the scary part is: you may never even notice. So any advisor worth their salt takes taxes seriously, and strives to minimize them as much as possible. These “invisible” wins are hard to spot in the moment, so let’s shine a light on them now. Here are four sophisticated ways we buy, sell, and hold your shares, all in the name of trimming your tax bill. Choosing which assets go where Rebalancing wisely Choosing which taxable shares to sell (or donate) Harvesting losses 1. Choosing which assets go where From a tax perspective, you have three main account types at your disposal when saving for retirement: Tax-deferred (traditional IRAs, 401(k)s, etc.), where taxes are paid later. Tax-exempt (Roth IRAs, 401(k)s, etc.), where taxes are paid now. Taxable, where taxes are paid both now and later. Because of their different tax treatments, certain types of investments are a better fit for certain accounts. Interest from bonds, for example, is typically taxed at a higher rate than stocks, so it often makes sense to keep them away from taxable accounts. This sorting of asset types based on tax treatments, rather than divvying them up equally across accounts, is known as asset location. And our fully-automated, mathematically-rigorous spin on it is called Tax Coordination. When Tax Coordination is turned on, the net effect is more of your portfolio's growth is shielded in a Roth account, the pot of money you crucially don't pay taxes on when withdrawing funds. To learn more about our Tax Coordination feature and whether it’s right for you, take a peek at its disclosure. 2. Rebalancing wisely When your portfolio drifts too far from its target allocation of assets, our technology automatically rebalances it. But there's more than one way to accomplish that goal. You can simply sell some of the assets that are overweight, and buy the ones that are underweight (aka "sell/buy" rebalancing), but that can realize capital gains and result in more taxes owed. So we first take advantage of any available cash flows coming into or out of your portfolio. When you make a withdrawal, for example, we intentionally liquidate overweight assets while striving to minimize your tax hit as much as possible (more on that below). And when you deposit money or receive dividends, we use those funds to beef up underweight assets. 3. Choosing which taxable shares to sell (or donate) Say there's no way around it: you need to sell an asset. Maybe cash flows aren't enough to keep your portfolio completely balanced. Or you’re withdrawing funds for a major purchase. The question then becomes: which specific assets should be sold? The IRS and many brokers follow the simple script of "first in, first out," meaning your oldest assets are sold first. This approach is easier for your broker, and it can avoid more highly-taxed short-term capital gains. But it often misses the opportunity of selling assets at a loss, and harvesting those losses for potential tax benefits. So our algorithms take a more nuanced approach to selecting shares, and we call this technology TaxMin. TaxMin is calibrated to avoid frequent small rebalance transactions and seek tax-efficient outcomes, things like avoiding wash sales and minimizing short-term capital gains. In the case of donating shares, we apply the same logic in reverse, or TaxMax as we call it. That's because when donating shares, it benefits you to choose the ones with the most gains, since any shares bought as a replacement will effectively have a reset tax bill. 4. Harvesting losses Life is full of ups and downs, and your investments are no exception. At times, their price may dip below what you paid for them. Tax loss harvesting takes advantage of these moments, selling taxable assets that fit this bill, then replacing them with similar ones. The result is you stay invested, and can then use those harvested losses to shift taxes you owe now into the future. The practice essentially sprinkles tax advantages on a portion of your taxable investing. And our fully-automated spin on it, Tax Loss Harvesting+, takes a tax strategy historically reserved for the wealthy and makes it available to the masses. Happy harvesting. In conclusion, we care about taxes Because it’s one of the most reliable ways to boost your returns. We can’t control the market, but tax laws? Those are set by the IRS and broadcast far and wide. And we can help you navigate them wisely. We wouldn’t be doing our job if we didn’t. So the next time you take a peek at your returns, ask yourself how much of that growth will still be there come tax time. If you’re a Betterment customer, you can rest assured we’re working tirelessly to minimize those tax drags. You may not realize it right away, and rightfully so. Live your life, and leave the tax toiling to us.

ETF selection methodology When constructing a portfolio, Betterment focuses on exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) with generally low costs and high liquidity. In the following piece, we detail Betterment’s investment selection methodology, including: Why ETFs Cost of Ownership (CO) Mitigating market impact Actively-managed investments Conclusion 1. Why ETFs? When constructing a portfolio, Betterment focuses on exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) with generally low costs and high liquidity. An ETF is essentially a basket which contains underlying securities, such as stocks and bonds, and generally come in two different flavors: passive (or index tracking) and active. By design, passive index ETFs closely track their benchmarks—such as the S&P 500. On the other hand, active ETFs represent a group of hand-selected securities decided upon by a portfolio manager with the intention of beating a benchmark. Additionally, ETFs have certain structural advantages when compared to mutual funds. These include: A. Clear goals and mandates Betterment generally selects ETFs that have mandates to passively track broad-market benchmark indexes. A passive mandate explicitly restricts the fund administrator to the singular goal of replicating a benchmark rather than making active investment decisions in an effort to beat the fund’s underlying benchmark. We largely favor such transparency and lower idiosyncratic market risk, yet some asset classes may benefit from fundamental research-driven security selection, and in some instances, Betterment employs the use of active ETFs managed by experienced external portfolio management teams (more on that below). B. Intraday availability ETFs are transactable during all open market hours just like any other stock. As such, they are heavily traded by the full spectrum of equity market participants including market makers, short-term traders, buy-and-hold investors, and fund administrators themselves creating and redeeming units as needed (or increasing or decreasing the supply of ETFs based on market demand). This diverse trading activity leads to most ETFs carrying low liquidity premiums (or lower costs to transact due to competition from readily available market participants pushing prices downward) and equity-like transaction times irrespective of the underlying holdings of each fund. This generally makes ETFs fairly liquid, which makes them cheaper and easier to trade on-demand for activities like creating a new portfolio or rebalancing an existing one. C. Low-fee structures Because most benchmarks update constituents (i.e., the specific stocks and related weights that make up a broad-market index) fairly infrequently, passive index-tracking ETFs also register lower annual turnover (or the rate a fund tends to transact its holdings) and thus fewer associated costs are passed through to investors. In addition, ETFs are generally managed by their administrators as a single share class that holds all assets as a single entity. This structure naturally lends itself as a defense against administrators practicing fee discrimination across the spectrum of available investors. With only one share class, ETFs are investor-type agnostic. The result is that ETF administrators provide the same exposures and low fees to the entire spectrum of potential buyers. Where actively-managed ETFs are utilized in Betterment portfolios, fees and expenses remain a critical aspect of our decision making.Our selection process will favor active over passive when we strongly believe the value added by an active manager outweighs its likely higher expense ratio.. D. Tax efficiency In the case when a fund (irrespective of its specific structure) sells holdings that have experienced capital appreciation, the capital gains generated from those sales must, by law, be accrued and distributed to shareholders by year-end in the form of distributions. These distributions increase tax liabilities for all of the fund’s shareholders. With respect to these distributions, ETFs offer a significant tax advantage for shareholders over mutual funds. Because mutual funds are not exchange traded, the only available counterparty available for a buyer or seller is the fund administrator. When a shareholder in a mutual fund wishes to liquidate their holdings in the fund, the fund’s administrator must sell securities in order to generate the cash required to satisfy the redemption request. These redemption-driven sales generate capital gains that lead to distributions for not just the redeeming investor, but all shareholders in the fund. Mutual funds thus effectively socialize the fund’s tax liability to all shareholders, leading to passive, long-term investors having to help pay a tax bill for all intermediate (and potentially short-term) shareholder transactions. Because ETFs are exchange-traded, the entire market serves as potential counterparties to a buyer or seller. When a shareholder in an ETF wishes to liquidate their holdings in the fund, they simply sell their shares to another investor just like that of a single company’s equity shares. The resulting transaction would only generate a capital gain or loss for the seller and not all investors in the fund. In addition, ETFs enjoy a slight advantage when it comes to taxation on dividends paid out to investors. After the passing of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, certain qualified dividend payments from corporations to investors are only subject to the lower long-term capital gains tax rather than standard income tax (which is still in force for ordinary, non-qualified dividends). Qualified dividends have to be paid by a domestic corporation (or foreign corporation listed on a domestic stock exchange) and must be held by both the investor and the fund for 61 of the 120 days surrounding the dividend payout date. As a result of active mutual funds’ higher turnover, a higher percentage of dividends paid out to their investors violate the holding period requirement and increase investor tax profiles. E. Investment flexibility The maturation and growth of the global ETF market over the past few decades has led to the development of an immense spectrum of products covering different asset classes, markets, styles, and geographies. The result is a robust market of potential portfolio components which are versatile, extremely liquid, and easily substitutable. Despite all the advantages of ETFs, it is still important to note that not all ETFs are exactly alike or equally beneficial to an investor. Betterment’s investment selection process seeks to select ETFs that provide exposure to the desired asset classes. For certain asset classes where markets are more efficient, we seek to achieve these asset class exposures through passively managed ETFs due to its cost-effectiveness. Alternatively, where Betterment utilizes active management, we conduct rigorous analysis and due diligence to best understand the trade-off of benchmark deviation for potential performance benefit. The cornerstone of Betterment’s approach to investment selection is our “Cost of Ownership” or CO, allowing us to effectively rank and select ETFs based upon their fees to hold and cost to trade. 2. Cost of Ownership (CO) The Cost of Ownership (“CO”) is Betterment’s fund scoring method, used to rate funds for inclusion in the Betterment portfolio. CO takes into account an ETF’s transactional costs as well as costs associated with holding funds. In addition to CO, Betterment also considers certain other qualitative factors of ETFs, particularly when Betterment considers the use of actively-managed funds. Qualitative factors may include, but are not limited to whether the ETF fulfills a desired portfolio mandate and/or exposure and due diligence interviews with portfolio management teams. CO is determined by two components, a fund’s cost-to-trade and cost-to-hold. The first, cost-to-trade, represents the cost associated with trading in and out of funds during the course of regular investing activities, such as rebalancing, cash inflows or withdrawals, and tax loss harvesting. Betterment defines the the cost-to-trade as the bid-ask spread, or the difference between the price at which you can buy a security and the price at which you can sell the same security at any given time. The second component, cost-to-hold, is represented by the ETF’s expense ratio, or the fund expenses imposed by an ETF administrator. Let’s review the specific inputs to each component in more detail: Cost-to-Trade: Bid-Ask spread Bid-Ask spread: Generally market transactions are associated with two prices: the price at which people are willing to sell a security, and the price others are willing to pay to buy it. The difference between these two numbers is known as the bid-ask spread, and can be expressed in currency or percentage terms. For example, a trader may be happy to sell a share at $100.02, but only wishes to buy it at $99.98. The bid-ask currency spread here is $.04, which coincidentally also represents a bid-ask percentage of 0.04%. In this example, if you were to buy a share, and immediately sell it, you’d end up with 0.04% less due to the spread. This is how traders and market makers make money—by providing liquid access to markets for small margins. Generally, heavily-traded securities with more competitive counterparties willing to transact will carry lower bid-ask spreads. Unlike the expense ratio, the degree to which you care about bid-ask spread likely depends on how actively you trade. Buy-and-hold investors typically care about it less compared to active traders, because they will accrue significantly fewer transactions over their intended investment horizons. Minimizing these costs is beneficial to building an efficient portfolio which is why Betterment attempts to select ETFs with narrower bid-ask spreads. Cost-to-Hold: Expense ratio Expense ratio: An expense ratio is the set percentage of the price of a single share paid by shareholders to the fund administrators every year. ETFs often collect these fees from the dividends passed through from the underlying assets to holders of the security, which result in lower total returns to shareholders. Finding cost of ownership We calculate CO as the sum of the above components: CO = "Cost-to-Trade" + "Cost-to-Hold" Where Cost-to-trade = 0.5 * bid-ask spread As mentioned above, cost-to-trade estimates the costs associated with buying and selling funds in the open market. This amount is weighted to appropriately represent the aggregate investing activities of the average Betterment client in terms of cash flows, rebalances, and tax loss harvests. Additionally, we utilize ½ of the bid-ask spread in our calculations as this mid-point is generally what customers realize in terms of trade costs. The cost-to-hold represents our expectations of the annual costs an investor will incur from owning a fund as defined by the fund’s expense ratio In many cases, cost-to-hold, which includes an ETF’s expense ratio, will be the dominant factor in the total cost calculations. Of course, one can’t hold a security without first purchasing it, so we must also account for transaction costs, which we accomplish with our cost-to-trade component. 3. Minimizing market impact Market impact, or the change in price caused by an investor buying or selling a fund, is incorporated into Betterment’s total cost number through the cost-to-trade component. This is specifically through the interaction of bid-ask spreads. However, we do review and monitor other trading-related metrics not represented specifically in the CO calculation when evaluating our universe of investable funds. Additional metrics include whether the ETF has relatively high levels of existing assets under management and average daily traded volumes. This helps to ensure that Betterment’s trading activity and holdings will not dominate the security’s natural market efficiency, which could either drive the price of the ETF up or down when trading. ETFs without an appropriate level of assets or daily trade volume might lead to a situation where Betterment’s activity on behalf of clients moves the existing market for the security. In an attempt to avoid potentially negative effects upon our investors, we generally do not consider ETFs with smaller asset bases and limited trading activity unless some other extenuating factor is present. 4. Actively-managed investments Compared to passive investments which track a broad-market index, actively-managed ones seek to outperform their benchmark index by selecting and weighting securities based on a fundamental company research or market outlook. Betterment believes that certain markets may favor active management, and therefore, are less efficient than others, resulting in an opportunity where value may be added through actively-managed investments Given this, Betterment believes that a rigorous due diligence process can help identify favorable active managers who have developed a time-tested research-driven investment process. Additionally, while active management may have the potential to add return potential, Betterment continues to hold true to its Core portfolio construction philosophy, prioritizing cost-efficiency. This results in the continued evaluation of any actively-managed investment strategies we utilize with their ability to beat the benchmark vs. their, typically, higher expense ratio. Conclusion As with any investment, ETFs are subject to market risk, including the possible loss of principal. The value of any portfolio will fluctuate with the value of the underlying securities. ETFs may trade for less than their net asset value (NAV). There is always a risk that an ETF will not meet its stated objective on any given trading day. Betterment reviews its investment selection analysis on a periodic basis to assess: the validity of existing selections, potential changes by fund administrators (raising or lowering expense ratios), and changes in specific ETF market factors,including tighter bid-ask spreads). Additionally, Betterment undertakes qualitative due diligence to enhance our selection process for actively-managed investments. Finally, at the core of our portfolio construction process, we are constantly considering the tax implications of portfolio selection changes and estimates the net benefit of transitioning between investment vehicles for our clients.