Asset Types

How socially responsible investing connects your holdings to your heart Learn more about this increasingly-popular category of investing. Socially responsible investing (SRI), also known as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing, screens for companies that consider both their returns and their responsibility to the wider world. It’s a growing market for investors, with assets totaling $30 trillion as of 2022. We launched our first SRI portfolio back in 2017, and have since expanded to a lineup of three options: Broad Impact Social Impact Climate Impact All three are globally-diversified, low-cost, and built to help align your investing with your values. So let’s explore a few ways they do that, before tackling a common question about the SRI category in general: performance. How our Social Impact portfolio lifts up underserved groups Social Impact uses the Broad Impact portfolio’s foundation while adding a trio of funds focused on helping underserved groups get on equal footing. There’s $SHE and $JUST, which screen for U.S. companies demonstrating a commitment toward gender and social equality, respectively. Then there’s $VETZ, our latest addition to the portfolio. $VETZ is the first of its kind: a publicly-traded ETF that mainly invests in loans to active and retired U.S. service members, and the survivors of fallen veterans. These types of home and small-business loans have historically helped diversify portfolios, and they also help lower borrowing costs for veterans and their families. And unlike $SHE and $JUST, which are comprised of stocks, $VETZ is an all-bond fund. So even if you have a lower appetite for risk when investing, your SRI portfolio can maintain an exposure to socially responsible ETFs. How the $VOTE fund is shaking up shareholder activism Remember the “G” in ESG? It stands for governance, or how companies go about their business. Do they open up their books when necessary? Is their leadership diverse? Are they accountable to shareholders? On that last front, there’s the $VOTE ETF found in each one of our SRI portfolios. On the surface, it seems like a garden variety index fund tracking the S&P 500. Behind the scenes, however, it’s working to push companies toward positive environmental and social practices. It does this by way of “proxy” voting, or voting on behalf of the people who buy into the fund. Engine No. 1, the investment firm that manages $VOTE, puts these proxy votes to use during companies’ annual shareholder meetings, where individual shareholders, or the funds that represent them, vote on decisions like board members and corporate goals. In 2021, Engine No. 1 stunned the corporate world by persuading a majority of ExxonMobile shareholders to vote for three new board members in the name of lowering the company’s carbon footprint. And it did all this in spite of holding just .02% of the company’s shares itself. Not a bad return on investment, huh? Does SRI sacrifice gains in the name of good? We now stand eye-to-eye with the elephant in the room: performance. Worrying about returns is common regardless of your portfolio, so it’s only natural to question how socially responsible investing in general stacks up against the alternatives. Well, the evidence points to SRI comparing quite well. According to a survey of 1,141 peer-reviewed papers and other similar meta-reviews: The performance of SRI funds has “on average been indistinguishable from conventional investing.” And while the researchers note that it’s “likely that these propositions will evolve,” they also found evidence that SRI funds may offer “downside” protection in times of social or economic crisis such as pandemics. Your socially responsible investing, in other words, is anything but a charity case. Simplifying the socially responsible space Not long ago, SRI was barely a blip on the radar of everyday investors. If you were hip to it, you likely had just two options: DIY the research and purchase of individual SRI stocks Pay a premium to buy into one of the few funds out there at the time Those days are thankfully in the past, because our portfolios make it easy to express your values through your investing. And our team of investing experts regularly seeks out new funds like $VETZ and updated SRI standards that strive to deliver more impact while helping you reach your goals. Check out our full methodology if you’re hungry for more details. And if you’re ready to invest for a better world, we’ve got you covered.

The most common asset classes for investors Every type of asset gains or loses value differently, so it helps to know what those types are and how they work. An asset class is a name for a group of assets that share common qualities and behave similarly in the market. They’re governed by the same rules and regulations, and gain or lose value based on the same factors and circumstances. Different asset classes have relatively little in common, and tend to have fluctuations in value that are imperfectly correlated. Common asset classes include: Equities (stocks) Fixed income (bonds) Cash Real Estate Commodities Cryptocurrencies Alternative investments Financial Derivatives Within these groups, there are several assets people commonly invest in. The most common types of assets for investors The three financial assets you may hear about the most are stocks, bonds, and cash. A strong investment portfolio often includes a balance of these assets, or combines them with others. Let’s take a closer look at each of these. Stocks A stock is a type of equity. It’s basically a tiny piece of a company. When you invest in stocks, you become a partial “owner” of the companies that issued those stocks. You don’t own the building, and you can’t go bossing around the employees, but you’re a shareholder. Your stock’s value is directly tied to the company’s profits, assets, and liabilities. And that means you have a stake in the company’s success or failure. Stocks are volatile assets—their value changes often—and they have historically had the greatest risk and highest returns out of these three asset categories (stocks, bonds and cash). Choosing stocks from a wide range of companies in different industries can be a smart way to diversify your portfolio. Bonds A bond represents a portion of a loan. Its value to the bondholder comes from the interest on the loan. Bonds are typically more stable than stocks—lower risk, lower reward. Bonds belong to the “fixed income” asset class, which focuses on preserving capital and income, and tend to depend on different risk variables than stocks. If a company has a bad quarter, that’s probably not going to affect the value of your bond, unless they have a really bad quarter then default on their loan. When stock markets have a bad month, investors tend to flock to safer asset classes. In those cases, returns on bonds may outperform returns from the stock market. Something else to consider with bonds is the impact of interest rates and inflation. When interest rates increase or decrease, they directly affect how much bond interest you accrue. And since bonds generate lower returns than stocks, they may struggle at times to beat inflation. Cash With cash investments, things like money market accounts and certificates of deposit (CDs), you’re basically loaning cash (often to a bank) in exchange for interest. This is usually a short-term investment, but some cash investments like CDs can lock up funds for a few years. These investments are often low-risk because you can be confident they will generate a return, even though it might be lower than returns for other types of asset classes. Cash investments offer higher liquidity, meaning you can more quickly sell or access these assets when you need the money. As such, the return you get is typically lower than what you’d achieve with other asset classes. Investors therefore tend to park the money they need to spend in the near-term in cash investments. Other common assets Those are the big three. But investors also invest in real estate, commodities, alternative asset classes, financial derivatives, and cryptocurrencies. Each of these asset classes come with their own set of risk factors and potential advantages. What about investment funds? An investment fund is a basket of assets that can include stocks, bonds, and other investments. The most common kinds of funds you can invest in are mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Mutual funds and ETFs are similar, but there’s a reason ETFs are gaining popularity: they’re usually cheaper. ETFs tend to be less expensive to manage and therefore typically have lower expense ratios. Additionally, mutual funds charge a fee to cover their marketing expenses. ETFs don’t. Mutual funds are also more likely to be actively managed, so they can have more administrative costs. Most ETFs are funds that simply track the performance of a specific benchmark index (e.g., the S&P 500), so there’s less overhead to manage ETFs than mutual funds. ETFs have another advantage: you can buy and sell them on the stock exchange, just like stocks. You can only sell a mutual fund once per day, at the end of the day. That’s not always the best time. Being able to sell at other times opens the door to other investment strategies, like tax-loss harvesting. How to choose the right assets When you start investing, it’s hard to know what assets belong in your investment portfolio. And it’s easy to make costly mistakes. But if you start with a goal, choosing the right assets is actually pretty easy. Say you want $100,000 to make a down payment on a house in 10 years. You have a target amount and a deadline. Now all you have to do is decide how much risk you’re willing to take on and choose assets that fit that risk level. For many investors, it’s simply a matter of balancing the ratio of stocks and bonds in your portfolio.

Inside the investing kitchen, part 1 The recipe for a better portfolio, and the science behind a safer nest egg. Jamie Lee isn’t a Top Chef, but he knows his way around the kitchen. He dabbles in sous vide with the help of a sous chef (his 6-year-old daughter). He loves smoking salmon low and slow on a pair of pellet grills. And in some ways, his day job on the Betterment Investing team resembles the culinary world as well. He and his teammates work in a test kitchen of sorts, defining and refining the recipes for our low-cost, high-performing, and globally-diversified portfolios. They size up ingredients, pair flavors, and thoughtfully assemble the courses of each “meal.” All in service of customers with varying appetites for risk. It's highly-technical work, but we wouldn't be Betterment if we didn't make our methodologies as accessible as possible. So whether you're kicking the tires on our services, or you're already a customer and simply curious about the mechanics of your money machine, come along for a three-part, behind-the-scenes look at how we cook up a better portfolio. Here in part 1, we'll explore how we allocate your investing at a high level. In part 2, we'll zoom in to our process for selecting specific funds. And in part 3 (coming soon), we'll show you how we handle thousands of trades each day to keep our customers’ portfolios in tip-top shape. The science behind a safer nest egg Betterment customers rely on Jamie and team to do the heavy lifting of portfolio construction. They distill handfuls of asset classes, a hundred-plus risk levels, and thousands of funds into a simple yet eclectic menu of investment options. And underpinning much of this process is something called Modern Portfolio Theory, a framework developed by the late American economist Harry Markowitz. The theory revolutionized how investors think about risk, and led to Markowitz winning the Nobel Prize in 1990. Diversification lies at the heart of Modern Portfolio Theory. The more of it your investing has, the theory goes, the less risk you're exposed to. But that barely scratches the surface. One of the meatiest parts of building a portfolio (and by extension, diversifying your investing) is how much weight to give each asset class, also known as asset allocation. Broadly speaking, you have stocks and bonds. But you can slice up the pie in several other ways. There’s large cap companies or less established ones. Government debt or the corporate variety. And even more relevant as of late: American markets or international. Jamie came of age in South Korea during the late 90s. Back here in the States, the dot-com bubble was still years away from popping. But in South Korea and Asia more broadly, a financial crisis was well underway. And it changed the trajectory of Jamie’s career. His interest in and application of math shifted from computer science to the study of markets, and ultimately led to a PhD in statistics. For Jamie, the interplay of markets at a global level is fascinating. So it’s only fitting that when optimizing asset allocations for customers, Jamie and team start with the hypothetical "global market portfolio," an imaginary snapshot of all the investable assets in the world. The current value of U.S. stocks, for example, represents about two-thirds the value of all stocks, so it's weighted accordingly in the global market portfolio. These weights are the jumping off point for a key part of the portfolio construction process: projecting future returns. Reverse engineering expected returns “Past performance does not guarantee future results.” We include this type of language in all of our communications at Betterment, but for quantitative researchers, or “quants,” like Jamie, it’s more than a boilerplate. It’s why our forecasts for the expected returns of various asset classes largely aren't based on historical performance. They're forward-looking. "Past data is simply too unreliable," says Jamie. "Look at the biggest companies of the 90s; that list is completely different from today.” So to build our forecasts, commonly referred to in the investing world as Capital Market Assumptions, we pretend for a moment that the global market portfolio is the optimal one. Since we know roughly how each of those asset classes performs relative to one another, we can reverse engineer their expected returns. This robust math is represented by a deceivingly short equation—μ = λ Σ ωmarket—which you can read more about in our full portfolio construction methodology. From there, we simulate thousands of paths for the market, factoring in both our forecasts and those of large asset managers like BlackRock to find the optimal allocation for each path. Then we average those weights to land on a single recommendation. This “Monte Carlo" style of simulations is commonly used in environments filled with variables. Environments like, say, capital markets. The outputs are the asset allocation percentages (refreshed each year) that you see in the holdings portion of your portfolio details Hypothetical portfolio; for illustration only At this point in the journey, however, our Investing team's work is hardly finished. They still need to seek out some of the most cost-effective, and just plain effective, funds that give you the intended exposure to each relevant asset class. For this, we need to head out of the test kitchen and into the market. So don’t forget your tote bag.