News

What To Expect When You Interview With Betterment Interviewing can be a long, stressful, and sometimes confusing process. We strive to make the experience as meaningful and enjoyable as possible. Transparency and inclusivity are the heart of everything we do, especially our hiring process. We want every candidate to have access to the information they need and to feel welcomed by everyone they interact with throughout our interview process. If you are interested in working at Betterment, keep reading for an in-depth look at what to expect during the process. For engineering roles, take a look at our Engineering Interviewing with Betterment post for specific details on that process. Finding the best Betterment role for you. The very first step when interviewing with Betterment is finding an open role that fits what you’re looking for in your next career move. The best place to view current openings is the Betterment Careers page. We are constantly updating it as new roles become available. You can also find openings on LinkedIn and Built In NYC. Once you’ve found a role, read through the job description carefully. If it aligns with your skills, experiences, and goals, we encourage you to apply. Because we know the job post is only the beginning of the journey, we aim to include the most relevant information to help you decide if you should apply. For example, we do not include years of experience on our job posts, but instead work to define the exact responsibilities in detail. If you sense that you're capable of what we've outlined, and energized by our job post, you should apply! Don't let a confidence gap get in the way of submitting your application. Join our Talent Community If you do not see the right match for you at this time, don’t worry! We recommend joining our Talent Community. Our hiring needs are always changing and we would be happy to keep you in mind once a role that better aligns with your skills and interests opens in the future. Our hiring process in depth. Once you submit your application, you have officially kicked off the hiring process with us. A member of the Betterment Recruiting team will review it and be in touch. Although you will likely hear back from us sooner, we ask that you give us up to a few weeks to thoroughly review your application given the high volume of applications we receive. If we would like to spend more time with you, the following steps outline the full interview process. While the interview process may vary depending on which role you are applying for, most will look similar to this. Recruiter Interview - A recruiter will reach out to set up time for a phone call to discuss your experiences, skills, and motivations. We will also cover the interview process timeline and compensation expectation details. Hiring Manager Phone Interview - The hiring manager for the role will give you a call to further discuss your background and share in depth details about the role and the team. Round 1 Virtual Interview - This is an opportunity to meet virtually with members of the team you’ll be working closely with Technical Exercise - Across all roles, we may look to evaluate job specific skills in the form of a written exercise or pair programming. We seek to collect a robust set of data points, and find that these exercises can round out what we learn about you from behavioral interviews. If it’s a take home test, you will be given 2-3 days to complete. If not, you will complete this exercise during your scheduled interviews and be instructed on how to prep. Final Round Virtual Interview - This is an opportunity to meet virtually with members of the team, and may include leadership and cross functional stakeholders. Offer - If you make it to this step, that means you thoroughly impressed us and we would be thrilled to have you join us! Please Note: We are conducting all interviews virtually until further notice. The full interview process will take one to two weeks to complete depending on your availability to interview. If you need to expedite the process for any reason, please let your recruiter know so they can work with you to meet your timelines. While we would love to have every candidate reach the offer stage, we often only have one position available. At any stage, if we don’t plan to move forward with your candidacy, you’ll hear from a member of our Recruiting team letting you know. If you need to withdraw from the process, please inform your recruiter at your earliest convenience. We value a fair, inclusive and consistent process. No matter which role you’re interviewing for, you can expect to have the same experience as other candidates who are interviewing for the same role. We run a structured, competency based interview process at Betterment to ensure a fair and inclusive process. Consistency is key to ensure we have the insights we need to make evidence based hiring decisions for every candidate. Furthermore, we're committed to seeing a robust slate of candidates before we make a hiring decision. If you have any timeline constraints, we recommend discussing them with your recruiter. We’re committed to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging. It’s important that our employees reflect the diversity of our customers as we’re building a service that’s for everyone. A diverse internal culture encourages innovation so much more than a homogeneous one. We want each candidate to have a pleasant and welcoming experience at every point of the interview process. It is our goal to have those values of inclusion shine during every candidate interaction. We hope all candidates feel welcomed, valued, and included no matter the outcome of their candidacy. On our applications, you will find a field asking you to share your preferred pronouns. While this section is optional, it is our goal to make sure we are being respectful to all candidates by knowing and addressing them by the pronouns of their choice. We are also dedicated to providing accommodations to candidates with disabilities. If you need accommodations at any point throughout the interview process, please reach out to interview.accommodations@betterment.com.

The Pandemic is Redefining Company Perks Our latest research shows workers value financial wellness support over benefits like extra vacation and office luxuries Amid the pandemic and “Great Resignation” of 2021, many workers have been seeking greater financial stability and support, particularly as they face rising healthcare costs, towering student debt, and uncertainty around retirement. This is one among several findings from new research by our 401k team. The new report, titled "The Impact of The Great Resignation on Benefits Needs and Expectations," polled 1,000 full-time U.S. employees to better understand their current financial situations, how they prioritize financial wellness benefits, and how those perks might impact talent acquisition and employee retention. Other highlights include: More than a year and a half into the pandemic, workers’ financial situations have yet to fully recover. More than half (54%) are more stressed about their finances than they were before the pandemic. Against this backdrop, financial wellness offerings have become more coveted. 401(k) plans and matching programs still take top billing, but employees are also seeking benefits like wellness stipends and student loan repayment programs. Expectations are rising. Nearly 3 in 4 of polled employees (74%) would likely leave their job for an employer that offered better financial benefits — a number that jumps to 85% for student loan borrowers. “Faced with new realities and shifting work environments, employers are reconsidering what provides value to their employees,” says Kristen Carlisle, general manager of our 401(k) team. She sees interest in student loan repayment benefits, for example, only growing once the freeze on federal student debt repayments ends this upcoming January 31. Employers can also do more in the meantime, Carlisle says, to help employees take advantage of the benefits they already have. Our research finds roughly 1 in 3 employees (36%) surveyed aren’t sure what financial wellness benefits their employer currently offers.

Our Customers Donated Over $2 Million Dollars To Charity in 2020 In 2020, our customers donated over $2 million dollars to charity through their appreciated shares. Let’s aim for even more in 2021. 2020 was an unprecedented year in many regards, with the COVID-19 pandemic leaving millions of Americans out of work as businesses were forced to close and many states issued shelter in place orders and other restrictive measures. It was also an unprecedented year for Betterment’s Charitable Giving feature, with new records in both the number of donations and the amount donated by our customers who chose to give back to those who are most in need. Many of our customers make generous gifts to charities in a variety of ways—whether it’s by spending their precious time, or by donating their hard-earned money. Our customers also have the choice to donate their invested securities to charities through their Betterment accounts. When securities are donated, the value of those assets is transferred directly to the charity. This is advantageous because the donor doesn’t pay taxes on the gain, and the recipient organization generally doesn’t pay taxes on the gain, either. In 2020, our customers donated over $2 million dollars to charity through their appreciated shares. Let’s aim for even more in 2021. Skip to the instructions for how to donate. Since launching our Charitable Giving feature in 2017, our customers have donated over $7.5 million dollars in appreciated shares to support causes near and dear to them. We are proud to support a community of smart investors with big hearts. This year, consider a smart giving strategy that can help you maximize your gifts while minimizing your tax liability. We’ll walk you through how it works. Donating securities should be as easy as donating cash. You’re trying to make a positive difference, so we believe you shouldn’t have to do any math or sign any forms. We want to keep it easy—as easy as giving cash. No snail mail, and no walking into an office. Here is a behind-the-scenes look at how we help make it easy. On your behalf, we track how much of your account is eligible to give to charity. You typically should only donate assets that you’ve held for more than one year, but we don’t expect you to sort through all the assets and pick which ones you can give. We’ll track those assets for you. We’ll estimate the tax benefits of your gift. Before you complete your gift, we’ll let you know the estimated tax benefits, including the expected deductible amount and potential capital gains taxes saved. We move assets from your account to a charitable organization’s account without any paperwork. With a traditional broker, a charitable gift has to move from your account to the organization’s brokerage account, which can take time and paperwork. Betterment is offering charities investment accounts without any advisory fees—on up to $1 million of assets—to make the gift process seamless. After the donation is complete, we provide a tax receipt. The receipt is emailed to you, and it will also be available in your Betterment account at all times. What’s more, we take much of the heavy lifting in reporting off of our partner charities. This means they can devote their resources more efficiently to the causes you are supporting, rather than to administrative tasks. Donating securities helps maximize your charitable impact. There are two tax advantages investors may be able to take advantage of when donating eligible shares. Eliminate capital gains taxes on donated shares. Deduct the value of the gift on your annual tax return. As long as you itemize your deductions, the entire value of your donated securities is deductible on your income tax return, just like any cash donation would be—as long as you’ve held the securities for more than one year. As an example, let’s say you make $150,000, are single, and live in New York. Your income places you into the current (2021) 15% long-term capital gains bracket, the 24% federal bracket, and the 6.41% state bracket.  If you donate $3,000 worth of shares to a charitable organization, and you bought those shares two years ago for $2,100, then you would save $192.69 in capital gains taxes. The full $3,000 could then be deducted on your tax return, saving you an additional $912.30. Overall, you end up with $1,104.99 in tax savings, which is about 21% more than if you had just donated the cash and taken the deduction. You can then use the extra tax savings towards future donations, helping to further maximize your impact. Value now Purchase value, two years ago Capital gains tax saved Deductible amount on tax return Total potential tax savings Donating shares $3,000 $2,100 $192.69 $3,000 $1,104.99 This is 21% more than a cash donation. Donating cash $3,000 n/a n/a $3,000 $912.30 The table above assumes the following about a hypothetical person donating to a charity: (1) The person itemizes the deductions on their tax return, and (2) The federal Alternative Minimum Tax does not apply to the person. Charitable giving works in tandem with our other tax-smart strategies. Our charitable giving capabilities automatically work in tandem with our other tax-smart strategies, such as Tax Loss Harvesting+. Imagine you started using Betterment two years ago. If any holdings in your portfolio took a loss in the first year—which is common—Tax Loss Harvesting+ (TLH+) would kick in, if you have it turned on. TLH+ would benefit you by harvesting those losses and selling the assets, which allows you to deduct up to $3,000 from your income at tax time. This practice essentially defers the tax liability from any future gains to a later date. If by the calendar year after the harvest, those same shares appreciated above the original purchase price, then they would be eligible to donate to charity. You could then avoid the taxes altogether because you will not owe the standard capital gains taxes you would otherwise be subject to. Donate while also keeping your financial goals on track. Once you donate shares from an investing goal, your goal’s overall account balance will naturally be lower. Immediately after you donate, we will ask you if you’d like to make a new cash deposit to promptly replenish your investment goal. If you redeposit, we can smartly rebalance your portfolio and help keep it on track to meet its goal. If you think of your replenishing deposit as the cash you otherwise would have given to charity, the process of giving and then redepositing ends up serving as a tax-optimized and cost-efficient cycle for transferring funds to charity. The graphic below, which visually represents this cycle, is for illustrative purposes only. If you do not redeposit after your donation, your account balance will, of course, remain lower—and we may rebalance your account as usual. Smart Investors + Big Hearts = Effective Altruism. You may already be familiar with effective altruism, which is the simple idea that you can increase how much value you create when you help others if you more thoughtfully apply your resources.   We offer access to a dozen charities, including GiveWell.org which carefully vets and directs donations to the most impactful causes, and Against Malaria Foundation, which protects low-income families from one of the largest killers in the world—mosquitos that carry malaria. See a full list of supported charities. Please note that we give no special preference to or endorse any one charity in particular, and the activities of each charity are not directly associated with or connected with Betterment. How to Donate Shares From Your Betterment Account To donate shares from your Betterment account, simply navigate to “Transfers” on the left and select “Give to Charity” under “Transfers from Betterment.” If your account has appreciated shares that have been held for more than a year, you can specify an amount to give, and then select which charitable organization(s) will receive your donation. Shortly after the transfer completes, you’ll receive a tax receipt via email. You can choose from the following charities: Against Malaria Foundation Big Brothers Big Sisters of NYC Boys and Girls Clubs of America Breast Cancer Research Foundation Brooklyn Community Bail Fund DonorsChoose.org Feeding America GiveWell Hour Children NAACP Empowerment Programs Save The Children The Trevor Project UNICEF USA World Wildlife Fund Wounded Warriors Family Support Don’t see your charity? See below... If you don’t currently see a charity you’d like to donate to, you can request a new charity be added. When you’re instructed to select a charity, there is an option to request a new one at the bottom of the page. In time, we will work with the requested charities to try to add them as an option.  Qualified Charitable Distributions Qualified charitable distributions can be made from most IRAs (excluding SEP and SIMPLE) if the owner is age 70½ or over. These distributions can be used to satisfy part or all of your required minimum distribution and these donations will not be counted as taxable income. Betterment can support QCDs from IRAs if you meet certain criteria. Please reach out to our team for further instructions. 2021, Here We Come Let’s maximize our ability to give back together, and help support those who are most in need this year. Our altruistic and tax-smart customers have donated over $7 million dollars to charity, with over $2 million dollars donated in 2020 alone. Can we beat that for 2021? For more information, see IRS Information for Charitable Contributions. Betterment is not a tax advisor, nor should any information herein be considered tax advice. Please consult a qualified tax professional.

The Fiduciary Rule Is on Life Support – We Must Act Now Whether or not the fiduciary rule survives could directly impact you. Because if it dies, and your money manager is no longer required by law to act in your best interest...are they going to anyway? You give your retirement money to a money manager. You expect them to look at all the investment options out there and make decisions based on what’s best for you, your portfolio, and your money’s growth over time. You expect them to act in your best interest—to do the right thing for you. You expect them to charge reasonable fees, try to minimize taxes, and make decisions that are going to get you the returns you deserve. You expect all of this because it’s their job. It’s what they’re paid to do. They’re the expert, the professional. Surely they’re going to advise you on the best investment decisions for you...right? I wish it were that simple, and I can’t believe it isn’t. But today, many money managers are not doing what’s best for you. They recommend funds because they make money selling them. They charge confusing fees that you can’t see. They push you into investments that are in their best interest—not yours. And the one thing that was going to help stop it might not survive. President Donald Trump on Feb. 3 signed a memorandum directing the Department of Labor (DOL) to reconsider its fiduciary rule, which would require money managers who provide retirement advice to act in their clients’ best interests. The rule was set to go into effect on April 10, but the DOL on Feb. 10 reportedly filed for a 180-day delay, putting the rule at risk of being diluted beyond recognition or, worse, thrown out completely. Whether or not this rule survives could directly impact you. Many companies were planning to make positive changes in response to the rule and publicly supported it, back when they were going to be required by law to do what was best for their clients. But now that the Trump administration is threatening the rule’s existence, we expect many of those institutions to remain silent, indicating that their former support was solely for public display. We believe that, in some ways, silence from those institutions is as bad as lack of public support. Because if your money manager is not openly supporting the rule, then they may not be willing to fight for you. And once the rule is gone for good, it could mean reverting to business as usual. We encourage you to reconsider your money manager or, at the very least, push them to clarify their stance. Because if the rule dies, and they’re no longer required by law to act in your best interest...are they going to anyway? The State of the Industry (Also Known As “Why This Rule Must Live”) The fiduciary rule’s six-year history has coincided with a secular shift in the industry that has felt promising and good. We’ve seen positive evolutions, like easier access to low-cost investments (e.g., exchange-traded funds) and heightened awareness of how financial providers are compensated. As the Washington Post’s Barry Ritholtz put it, “The fiduciary rule is not shaping investor behavior, it is now catching up with it." But now that the rule has the potential to be thrown out, we have to reexamine the conflicts of interest that are costing American workers and their families $17 billion a year—and that could persist without the proper regulations in place. Many money managers (brokers) are not currently required to make investment recommendations based on your best interests, and instead only need to pick “suitable” investments. They are allowed to consider whether a particular recommendation will result in a higher commission or kickbacks to them. As a result, you are likely to end up in a less-than-ideal portfolio—one that’s higher-cost and lower-return than it should be. This Is What Firms Are Allowed To Do. Is It Happening to You? Here’s the Way It Should Be We believe in low, transparent fees. We believe that when you give your money to a money manager, they should choose funds based on what’s best for you, the customer—not your money manager. A Defective Argument: The Fiduciary Rule “Limits Investors’ Choice” There have been various arguments opposing the fiduciary rule. The most recent came from Gary Cohn, the White House National Economic Council Director, who said that the rule would limit investors’ rights to choose their investments. He told The Wall Street Journal in an interview: “We think it is a bad rule. It is a bad rule for consumers…. This is like putting only healthy food on the menu, because unhealthy food tastes good but you still shouldn’t eat it because you might die younger.” It’s an interesting analogy, but it’s flawed. The rule isn’t about limiting choice (all the choices are still there); it’s about empowering consumers with information to make better decisions and forcing advisors to give straightforward advice. The right analogy would be both options are still on the table—you want to eat a cheeseburger instead of a salad, you can still do that—but you’ll know exactly how many calories are in it and how much it’ll cost you. In the case of financial services, if you want to put your money in a worse investment product, you can still do that—and the advisor has to disclose all the fees associated with it, and can’t tell you it’s the best option for you (unless it truly is). The text of the rule itself is clear on this point; it simply requires advisors to make an investment recommendation that they can demonstrate is in an investor’s best interest. Sure, that may be the lowest-cost option, but not necessarily. If advisors are not able to defend the investment products they are recommending, including their cost, investors will not suffer from their absence. If you want a good analogy for what this rule could do for financial services, consider the medical industry. Doctors aren’t allowed to get paid by drug companies for pushing drugs on you. That would be ridiculous, right? Why should it be different in financial services? Why should so-called financial advisors be allowed to be compensated for pushing certain products on you? It’s ridiculous! They shouldn’t. And, if we have our way, they won’t. Former Rule Champions, Where Are You Now? We’ve been closely following which big financial firms are committed to the positive changes represented by the fiduciary rule. Last fall, when it was expected that the rule would go into effect this April, many firms publicly trumpeted their support. Merrill Lynch came out with an ad campaign that declared, “We’re committed to your best interest. Not the status quo.” Other firms, like J.P.Morgan and Commonwealth Financial Group, announced they’d be cutting commissions in their retirement accounts to comply with the rule. Now that the rule’s future is in doubt, Merrill Lynch is retreating from its support of the rule and has indicated it may not complete the changes it previously committed to making. Many other firms have likewise gone silent on their support for the rule and their intent to follow through on earlier commitments. Some firms are even gloating over the fact that they didn’t take a position on the rule or commit to changes. AdvisorHub.com quoted UBS Chief Financial Officer Kirt Gardner saying, “There is some indication that [the DOL Rule] will, at a minimum, be delayed and potentially not be implemented at all. And because we delayed our announcement…that’s proved to be very effective given some of the commitments that our competitors have made.” It’s become extremely difficult to get individual firms to commit to a clear public position on the fiduciary rule. In January, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., a longtime supporter of the rule, sent a letter to 33 financial institutions that had already begun making changes designed to satisfy the rule’s regulations. She warned them that the rule was under attack, while also questioning whether they supported it and would continue to work toward implementing changes. This was an opportunity for these firms to speak out in support of the rule. Twelve firms ignored the letter. Of the 21 that responded, many provided a general statement about the importance of the rule's objectives, but declined to make a clear commitment to its actual implementation. Make no mistake, though, the fiduciary rule is the only realistic hope for prompt action to improve the quality of retirement advice. If firms genuinely support the rule's objectives, they should also support the rule. In the coming weeks, we encourage you to watch closely to see which firms are willing to take a clear public stand on behalf of investors, and which are silent or hide behind trade groups. What You Can Do to Protect Your Right to Honest Financial Advice Today, I’m sad for retirement savers. I’m disappointed that so many of us have trusted people we’ve chosen to manage our money, to prepare us for the future, and yet we still can’t be sure if they’re doing the right thing for us. I’m angry that the one ruling that could make us feel confident again is under attack. Why would anyone want to get rid of something that could do so much good? We encourage you to advocate for yourself and your future by submitting a public comment in support of the fiduciary rule here. You can also contact your elected representative and/or financial provider to share your support for the rule. Then it might be time to ask your money manager these questions: Why are your services and investments right for me and my situation? Who makes money from my account—and how much? Do you make more money recommending some investments over others? Are you committed to acting in my best interests for all my accounts, at all times? We’re not giving up on this. We stand for our customers and their best interests, and we always will. We don’t take political sides, but we are fighting for this rule until all investors receive advice they can trust. Because if the rule dies, whether it’s quick or slow, it’s sure to be painful. A version of this article originally appeared on CNBC.

Meet $VOTE: Channeling Our Values Through Shareholder Engagement We're adding the new $VOTE ETF to our Socially Responsible Investing portfolios. Here's why it gives investors more power to advocate for their values. Today, we are excited to announce that we will begin integrating the $VOTE ETF, recently launched by Engine No. 1, into all of Betterment’s Socially Responsible Investing portfolios. This new ETF invests in 500 of the largest U.S. companies, weighted according to their size, with a management fee of only .05%. You might think that this sounds a lot like a garden variety index fund tracking the S&P 500—a commodity for many years now. So, why the excitement? In short, $VOTE represents a highly innovative approach to pushing the economy towards sustainability via index fund investing. It may be “passive” in the traditional sense—buying shares in companies purely based on an index—but it is “active” when it comes to engaging with those companies as a shareholder. Beyond Divestment: What’s Shareholder Engagement? Historically, values-aligned investing has often been synonymous with avoiding the purchase of certain stocks—a practice often referred to as “divestment.” The alternative to divestment is “engagement.” By owning a stock, and using your rights to vote on shareholder resolutions, you can attempt to change the company’s activities from the inside. Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street—the “Big Three” largest fund managers—are collectively the biggest shareholders in most companies, but have historically been reluctant to rock the boat and aggressively challenge management. As a result, when it comes to investing through index funds, the full potential of shareholder engagement to drive change hasn’t been tapped. Engine No. 1’s new $VOTE ETF promises to change that. To understand why, it helps to understand the mechanics of how shareholders can push for change. Proxy Voting Purchasing stock in a company grants you not just a share of its profits, but also the right to influence its decision-making. This process is called “proxy voting,” which can be a powerful tool with the potential to transform the entire economy, company by company. Publicly traded companies operate like quasi-democracies, accountable to their shareholders. They hold annual meetings, where shareholders can vote on a number of topics. Shareholders who disagree with some aspect of how a company’s business is conducted can engage with management, and if they feel they aren’t being heard, can present an alternate course of action by making a “shareholder proposal.” If they can persuade a majority of all shareholders to vote in support of the proposal, they can overrule management. When more drastic change is warranted, such “activist” shareholders can seek to replace management entirely, by nominating their own candidates for the company’s board of directors. Shareholder Activism: Social Change Through Engagement Social change via shareholder activism has a storied history. As early as 1951, in a seminal case, civil rights leader James Peck took the fight to the proxy arena, by filing a shareholder proposal with the Greyhound Corporation, recommending that the bus operator abolish segregated seating in the South. Seventy years later, on May 26, 2021, activist hedge fund Engine No. 1 stunned the corporate world by winning a proxy battle against the current leadership of ExxonMobil, persuading a coalition of shareholders to elect three of its own candidates to the board—the first ever climate-centered case for change. Engine No. 1 argued that Exxon’s share price was underperforming that of its peers because the company was unprepared for the transition away from fossil fuels. It nominated candidates for the board that would push the oil giant to embrace renewable energy. Against all odds, holding just .02% of Exxon’s stock, Engine No. 1 prevailed.  Corporate boardrooms across the entire S&P 500 are buzzing, asking what the Exxon coup means for them. Where will environmentally and socially conscious investors strike next? These questions are warranted: The Exxon campaign was a first, but it surely won’t be the last. “Index Activism”: Bringing Power To The People Individual investors are increasingly aware of proxy voting as a domain by which their portfolios can channel their values. In a recent Morningstar report, 61% of those surveyed said that sustainability should be factored into how votes attributable to their 401(k)s are cast. However, most Americans, including Betterment customers, don’t buy stock of companies like Greyhound or Exxon directly, but through index funds. When you buy a share of an index fund, the index fund manager uses your money to buy stocks of companies on your behalf. As a shareholder of the fund, you benefit financially when these underlying stocks rise in value, but the index fund is technically the shareholder of each individual company, and holds the right to participate in each company’s proxy voting process. As more investors tell the industry that they want their dollars to advance sustainable business practices, the Big Three have been feeling the pressure to work these preferences into their proxy voting practices. This year, they are showing some signs of change. Notably, the Big Three ultimately joined Engine No. 1’s coalition, which could not have prevailed against Exxon without their support. However, even if the Big Three, who manage trillions on behalf of individual investors, continue to side with the activists, what’s missing is a way for individuals to invest their dollars not just to support these campaigns, but to spearhead them as well.   What Makes $VOTE Special Activist shareholder campaigns are generally led by hedge funds, and what happened with Exxon was no exception. However, by launching an ETF that anyone can invest in, Engine No. 1 is looking to break that mold. In 2020, investors poured $50 billion into sustainable index funds—double that of 2019, and ten times that of 2018. The $VOTE ETF should bring even more investors off the sidelines, and into sustainable investing, for two reasons. First, rather than dilute its efforts, $VOTE intends to spearhead a handful of campaigns, pushing companies to improve their environmental and social practices. A focus on the highest impact, and most powerful narratives, will continue to raise awareness for the power of shareholder activism. Second, $VOTE is designed for mass adoption, not as a niche strategy. With a management fee of only .05%, and tracking a market cap weighted index, $VOTE is designed to ensure no trade-off to long-term returns. It is also well-suited for those investing for retirement—and as of today, it will make its way into its first ever 401(k) plan, via Betterment for Business. What Does $VOTE Mean For Investors? We know that many of our customers want to invest for real impact, especially if they can do so without sacrificing their long-term financial goals. If you’re investing through any of Betterment’s three Socially Responsible Investing portfolios, $VOTE will have a target weight equal to 10% of your exposure to the U.S. stocks. With $VOTE in your portfolio, you’ll know that your dollars are directly supporting whatever engagements Engine No. 1 launches next. As their subsequent work unfolds, we will be monitoring their efforts, and updating our customers on the impact their investments are driving. Now that $VOTE exists, anyone—not just Betterment customers—can invest in it, which is a great thing. The bigger it gets, the more it can drive change, and you, as an investor, get to help write the next chapter.

How Memestocks Affected Investors’ Actions And Emotions In April, Betterment surveyed 1,500 investors to examine “the rise of the day trader,” and how ‘memestocks’ affected their actions and emotions when it comes to making financial decisions. Money and emotions have long gone hand-in-hand, and this is no more apparent than during significant financial crises. From the 2008 market crash to COVID-19’s economic impact, we’ve seen first hand how money has the ability to impact our stress levels, mental health and personal relationships. And yet in times of particular financial strife—or likely because of it— many people take actions with their money that often undermine their emotional wellbeing, sacrificing long-term happiness for short-term pleasure without even realizing it at the time. This trend toward short-termism grew in 2020: people stuck inside, on screens all day and kept from their normal activities sought new ways to fill their time and energy. Many took up day trading, culminating in one of the wildest rides at the beginning of 2021 (and recent surges demonstrating people are still trying to head to the moon) with Gamestop, AMC, Blackberry and other retail stocks caught in the middle of a clash between amateur retail and institutional investors. Following this eventful start to the year, Betterment was curious to see both the immediate and long-term impact this had on investors, particularly those involved in the action. In this report -- a survey of 1,500 active investors conducted by a third party -- we took a look at the rise of day trading activity and the impact it did (or didn’t have) on people’s behavior. From their own forecasts, it looks like “the rise of the day trader” is here to stay -- but forecasting is hard. None of us would have bet on the pandemic and the changes it's causing. People actually aren't very good at forecasting their own preferences and behavior in the future, so it will be interesting to see if said forecasts actually come to fruition. Regardless, at Betterment we welcome the addition of consumers looking to learn more about the markets and, ultimately, how to balance their portfolios for the long-term too. Section One: The Rise Of Day Trading Activity With movie theaters, stadiums, bars and restaurants closed, many people took up day trading during the COVID-19 pandemic. Half of our total respondents said they actively day trade investments, and nearly half of those day-traders (49%) have been doing it for 2 years or less. While most day traders indicated their main reason for doing so was that they believed they could make more money in a shorter period of time (58%), many (43%) also indicated it was because it is fun and entertaining. Of those who look to day trading for fun/entertainment, half (52%) said it was to make up for the bulk of their other hobbies—like sports, live music, social gatherings, gambling—not being available due to COVID-19. And these day traders have fully acknowledge that COVID-19 played a big impact role in their market activity overall: 54% indicated they trade more often as a result of COVID-19; and interestingly, 58% said they expect to day trade more as normal activities return and COVID-19 restrictions are lifted, likely as a result of what they learned during this downtime. Only 12% said they expect to trade less. More than half (58%) are using less than 30% of their portfolio to actively trade individual securities or stocks. Nearly two thirds also allow an advisor (either online or in-person) to manage a separate part of their portfolio. Betterment's Point Of View: It is interesting to see more respondents expect to day trade more after the pandemic than are currently day trading: we imagine it is hard for people to forecast themselves into the future and imagine doing things differently than they are now. However, what is positive to see is these people aren’t using an excessive amount of their portfolio to day trade. The majority of investors day trade with a minority of their total investing balance, and delegate day-to-day management of the larger portion of their portfolio to an advisor. Passing hobby or not, how educated is the average day trader on what they’re buying and what they stand to gain—or lose? Sixty one percent rely on financial news websites to decide which stocks to buy, but nearly half (42%) are influenced by social media accounts, showing just how powerful “memestocks” can be. Betterment's Point Of View: More than half of the respondents suggested they buy stocks based on company names they’re familiar with, but we’ve seen this lead to issues in the past—with “ticker mis-matches,” where people trade the ticker of a stock that isn't the correct company. For example, after a tweet from Elon Musk about Signal (a non-profit messaging app), a different company’s stock was sent soaring 3,092%. We also asked day trader respondents if they consider capital gains taxes when deciding to sell their investments. While the majority (60%) indicated that it influences them to hold onto stocks longer to avoid short-term capital gains, 14% said they weren’t aware there was a difference in taxes based on how long they hold a stock. Another 17% said they simply don’t care about the short-term capital gains tax. Who invested their stimmys? Almost all (91%) respondents received some stimulus money, and nearly half (46%) invested some of that money; of those who did invest it, 70% invested half or less of their stimulus. Day trader and male respondents were more likely to invest then their counterparts, as represented in the graphic below. This is in contrast to our COVID-19 investor sentiment survey from 2020, where only 9% of respondents indicated they put some of their stimulus money towards investment. Last year’s response pool was primarily focused on building out their emergency funds, with 40% putting money into a safety net. This is a good indication that respondents are more comfortable with their financial situations this year, compared to the throes of the pandemic. Section Two: Memestocks Understanding And Involvement We asked all respondents how well they understood what occurred in the stock market in January & February surrounding “memestocks” like GameStop, AMC, BlackBerry and other retail investments. Most indicated having some level of understanding, but nearly a quarter (24%) of all respondents said they didn’t understand it well at all; and only half (51%) of day trader respondents said they understood what happened very well. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of all survey respondents said they did not actively purchase any popular retail investments (GameStop, AMC, BlackBerry, etc.) during the stock market rally in January or February. But those that DID were primarily day traders. Of all respondents that did buy in actively, 55% are still holding onto all their investments. Only 2% of those that sold these investments sold everything at a loss; 44% sold all for a profit and 54% sold some at a profit and some at a loss. Of those that bought into memestocks, there is a near universal consensus that they will continue investing in stocks like these that get a lot of attention in the future—97% said they’re at least somewhat likely to invest. Betterment's Point Of View: It is interesting to see the majority of respondents holding onto their investments - are they expecting another high or holding on because they don't want to admit they made a bad investment? Disposition Effect says people tend to hold on until they get back to zero loss; but seeing so few sell entirely for a loss is encouraging. However, 60% previously said thinking of short-term capital gains taxes encourages them to hold onto their investments longer, which is good to see. Section Three: Money And Stress Factors It’s no secret that money and stress are linked, so we wanted to take a look at respondents’ money habits and how that may be impacting stress levels. The consensus is that for better and for worse day traders and younger generations are more engaged with their finances. We asked respondents how much they stress about their finances on a daily basis—three quarters said they stress to some degree. Interestingly, when we looked a layer deeper, day traders are much more stressed than non-day trader—86% indicated they stress to some degree, vs 65% of their counterparts. Unsurprisingly, younger generations are more stressed about their finances than older ones. In looking at the causes of the stress: respondents are nearly equally concerned about money in the short term, near term future, and long term future with the top 3 financial stress factors being their daily expenses (43%), how much money they will have in retirement (43%), and how much money they have saved (42%). We asked respondents how often they are checking their bank account and investment portfolio balances -  39% are looking at their bank account balances every day, with 11% of those checking multiple times a day; 37% also check their investment portfolio balances every day, with 16% of those checking multiple times a day. When we look a layer deeper, we find that day traders are checking both their bank account and investment portfolio balances significantly more than non-day traders. Interesting Bank Account Habits 50% of day traders indicated they check at least once a day (18% multiple times) vs 29% of non-daytraders (5% multiple times). Men check their accounts more often—41% at least once a day (13% multiple times) vs 36% of women (8% multiple times). 46% of Gen Z/Millennials and Gen X both said they check their accounts at least once a day, whereas only 28% of Boomers said the same. Those making more money actually check their accounts more often—42% respondents making $100K or more check every day, compared to 39% of those making between $50-100K and 35% of those making less than $50K. Interesting Investment Account Habits Unsurprisingly, 56% of day traders said they check their investment portfolio balances every day (25% multiple times a day), whereas only 18% of non-day traders said the same. 41% of men check every day, compared to 30% of women. 47% of Gen Z/Millennials check every day, compared to 41% of Gen X and 22% of Boomers. 42% of those making 100K or more check every day, compared to 35% making between $50-100K and 30% of those making less than $50K. Betterment's Point Of View: The differences between men and women here are in line with research we’ve seen elsewhere. Women are less focused on market performance, and more focused on the end financial outcome. They also tend to invest at lower risk levels, so are less likely to see extreme ups and downs. Additionally, Women tend to be less competitive/score based in general, so are less interested in monitoring the game. Encouragingly, when we asked people how they felt checking these accounts, the positive responses outweighed negative options for both. Interestingly, day traders were significantly more excited for both (21% for bank accounts, 25% for investments) than non-day traders (4% and 12%, respectively) as well. Most respondents (89%) indicated they’re putting some money away every month, but it's equally split as to where that money is actually going. Conclusion At Betterment, we have often compared day trading to going to Vegas—have a great time, enjoy yourself, but be prepared to come back home with fewer dollars in your wallet and a hangover.  The trends outlined in this report seem to indicate that more people are dipping their toe into the investing pool and (so far) few have decided to walk away. Whether this trend will continue—and the long term impact it will have on people’s finances, health, stress, etc.—remains to be seen. And for those who want to avoid the FOMO of the next big memestock, but aren’t sure of the best way to get started—a simple alternative is investing in a well diversified portfolio. That way, whenever someone asks if you own the hottest thing, you can say “yes”, regardless of what it is. Methodology An online survey was conducted with a panel of potential respondents from April 26, 2021 to May 3, 2021. The survey was completed by a total of 1,500 respondents who are 18 years and older and have any kind of investment (excluded if only 401k). Of the 1,500 respondents, 750 of them actively day traded their investments while the other 750 did not. The sample was provided by Market Cube, a research panel company. All respondents were invited to take the survey via an email invitation. Panel respondents were incentivized to participate via the panel’s established points program, regardless of positive or negative feedback. Participants were not required to be Betterment clients to participate. Findings and analysis are presented for informational purposes only and are not intended to be investment advice, nor is this indicative of client sentiment or experience. Any links provided to other websites are offered as a matter of convenience and are not intended to imply that Betterment or its authors endorse, sponsor, promote, and/or are affiliated with the owners of or participants in those sites, unless stated otherwise.